Screening and monitoring patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with immunosuppressive agents for hepatitis B reactivation.

Immunosuppressive drugs are used for treating coronavirus disease 2019COVID-19pneumonia. This study examined the current status of screening and monitoring patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with immunosuppressive agents for hepatitis B virusHBVreactivation. Of 123 patients whose hepatitis B surface antigen level was measured, 2 were HBsAg-positive. Antihepatitis B core/surface antibodies were measured in all 121 HBsAg-negative patients. HBV DNA was measured in 31 of 32 patients who were positive for either or both antihepatitis B core/surface antibodies. Of 34 patients requiring regular monitoring, only 4 were monitored. The HBV monitoring rate at the initiation of COVID-19 treatment was high. How-ever, HBV monitoring after COVID-19 treatment was difficult because most patients were transferred to other hospitals or had their treatment terminated.Copyright © 2022 Takeshi Matsui et al.

A pre-existing case of HBV infection with elevated HBV DNA after COVID-19 pneumonia treatment.

The patient presented with fever and appetite loss. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a moderate grade 2 pneumonia. Besides, further blood examination showed his HB antigen as negative, anti-HBs/c anti-body as positive, and HBV DNA level as 1.0 LIU/mL. Therefore, he was diagnosed with COVID-19. Administered treatments comprised oxygen inhalation and steroid therapy, including pulses, remdesivir, and baricitinib, which improved pneumonia. Interestingly, one month posttreatment, his HBV DNA level in-creased to 1.4 LIU/mL, followed by a further increase to 1.7 LIU/Ml, showing an improvement. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate was thus administered. In clinical practice, immunosuppressive therapy is used for patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumo-nia. However, close attention should also be paid to the elevation of blood HBV DNA levels during and after treatment.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

Evaluation of Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibody Levels in Coronavirus Disease Breakthrough Infection During Immunosuppressive Therapy in a Patient with Connective Tissue Disease-Related Interstitial Lung Disease.

Herein, we report the case of a 67-year-old man with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine breakthrough infection during immunosuppressive therapy for connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The patient received glucocorticoids combined with tacrolimus (TAC) as maintenance therapy. His serum anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibody levels were extremely low at the onset of COVID-19 pneumonia, even after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2). After treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia, the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies increased. These results indicated a lack of the ability to produce neutralizing antibodies from immune cells despite the booster vaccination. Therefore, we suggest that advanced age patients with CTD-ILD receiving immunosuppressive therapy with polypharmacy require consistent personal protection, vaccination of close caregivers, increased awareness, and booster vaccination. Moreover, we recommend that TAC should be withdrawn for a while after vaccination under controlled conditions.

COVID-19 in children with severe aplastic anemia

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects children but mostly has mild course. There is meagre published data on the impact of COVID-19 illness in children with Severe Aplastic anemia (SAA). We describe our experience of managing COVID-19 in children with SAA. Method: Three children of SAA who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection are included in this study. Results: Patient 1 was post Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for SAA and had an asymptomatic course and uneventful recovery. Patient 2 was several months post IST with no response and had an asymptomatic COVID-19 illness but had delayed viral clearance, however he succumbed to bacterial sepsis soon after. Patient 3 was awaiting IST and while he contracted severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, he had symptomatic COVID-19 illness followed by bacterial and fungal sepsis to which he succumbed. Conclusion: COVID-19 in children with SAA can be mild to fatal course and virus may have delayed clearance. It can lead to delay in therapy of SAA. © 2022 Pediatric Hematology Oncology Chapter of Indian Academy of Pediatrics

[Antibody production capacity after COVID-19 vaccination in immune-mediated neuromuscular diseases under immunotherapy].

The post-vaccination antibody response in patients with immune-mediated neuromuscular diseases under immuno-suppressive therapy has not been sufficiently verified. The Japanese Society of Neurology has stated that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination should be given priority in patients with immunotherapy-associated neuromuscular diseases; however, data on antibody production to a novel mRNA vaccine are scarce in these patients. In this study, we aimed to measure residual antibody titers after the second dose and produced antibodies after the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in 25 patients with neuromuscular diseases under immuno-suppressive therapy (disease group). We compared the disease group antibody titers with those of 829 healthy employees in our hospital (control group). The disease group included 17 patients with myasthenia gravis, 4 with multiple sclerosis, 3 with inflammatory muscle disease, and 1 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies. Seven cases of the disease group showed negative antibody levels (<15.0 s/co) before the third vaccination, and antibody titers in the positive cases ranged from 16.9 to 4,589.0 s/co. Three of the seven antibody-negative cases turned positive after the third vaccination, and all but one of the antibody-positive cases showed a booster effect, with antibody titers after the third dose ranging from 245.1 to 85,374.0 s/co (1.0 to 885.0 times higher than those before vaccination). Although the immune response in the disease group was modest compared to the control group, in which antibody titers after the third vaccination ranged from 67.8 to 150,000 s/co (0.9 to 5,402.1 times higher than those before vaccination), the result indicated that a constant immune response was achieved under immuno-suppressive therapy. Even in the control group, three participants tested negative for residual antibody before the third inoculation, and four of the antibody-positive participants (27.7-24,054.0 s/co) lacked a booster effect after the third vaccination.

Infections and causative microorganisms in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to detect infections requiring hospitalization in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV).Materials and Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study conducted in Turkish patients with AAV. Infection episodes requiring hospitalization, reproducing pathogens, laboratory findings, immunosuppressive treatments given for the treatment of vasculitis, and the relationship with the infection were evaluated.Results: Seventy-four patients diagnosed with AAV were included in the study. Hospitalization due to infection was observed in 36 of the patients. The coexistence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was found to be significantly higher in the infected patient group. Cyclophosphamide (CYC) treatment found to increase risk of infection. More than 80% of the infected patient group presented with renal involvement (80.6%). A total of 68 infectious episodes were seen in 36 patients. The most common involvement of infection was the respiratory tract with a rate of 70.6%. Gram-negative bacteria were the most common pathogen, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa. With the effect of the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has come to the fore among viral infections. Aspergillosis was the most frequently detected among fungal infections. Besides, aspergillosis was the cause of 85.7% (6 episodes) of fungal infections. Lymphopenia was observed in 76.5% of the infection episodes. 57.4% of infections developed in the first year of the induction therapy. The most frequently used immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of vasculitis in infectious episodes was CYC (41.2%).Conclusion: Managing infections during the vasculitis treatment is crucially important. Lymphopenia, kidney involvement, DM and immunosuppressive therapy are factors that increase the risk of infection. Clinicians should take preventive measure especially for respiratory tract infections and gram-negative bacteria as pathogens.

High prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of liver transplant recipients in central Italy

Asymptomatic subjects account for 25 to 45% of SARS-CoV-2 infections, and in particular, subjects on mild immunosuppressive therapy may have symptoms masked and could spread virus for an extended period of time. To determine the cumulative incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated risk factors, we conducted a prospective clinical and serological survey in a cohort of 278 liver transplant recipients (LTRs) from Central Italy. Three different serology tests were performed every 4 months in 259 LTRs between April 2020 and April 2021: one based on raw extract of whole SARS-CoV-2 virus and two on specific viral antigens (nucleoprotein and receptor binding domain) to detect specific IgG, IgM and IgA. Hundred fifteen LTRs who reported symptoms or close contact with a SARS-CoV-2-positive subject, or had a positive serological result underwent molecular testing by standard screening procedures (RT-PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab). Thirty-one past or active SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified: 14 had positive molecular test (64% symptomatic), and 17 had positive serology only (18% symptomatic). SARS-CoV-2 infection was not statistically related to gender, age, obesity, diabetes, renal impairment, type of anti-rejection therapy or time from transplant. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases (61.3%) were more frequent in males and in those with glomerular filtrate rate >50 ml/min. Overall, the addition of repeated serology to standard diagnostic molecular protocols increased detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection from 5.1% to 10.9%. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among our LTRs (11.2%) is comparable to the general population of Central Italy, considered a medium-impact area. Only one asymptomatic subject (6%) was found to carry SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory tract at the time of serological diagnosis.Copyright © 2021 The Authors

Comparable cellular and humoral immunity upon homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens in kidney transplant recipients.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for a severe course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); thus, effective vaccination is critical. However, the achievement of protective immunogenicity is hampered by immunosuppressive therapies. We assessed cellular and humoral immunity and breakthrough infection rates in KTRs vaccinated with homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens. Method: We performed a comparative in-depth analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific T-cell responses using multiplex Fluorospot assays and SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) between three-times homologously (n = 18) and heterologously (n = 8) vaccinated KTRs. Results: We detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells in 100% of KTRs upon third vaccination, with comparable frequencies, T-cell expression profiles, and relative interferon γ and interleukin 2 production per single cell between homologously and heterologously vaccinated KTRs. SARS-CoV-2-specific NAb positivity rates were significantly higher in heterologously (87.5%) compared to homologously vaccinated (50.0%) KTRs (P < 0.0001), whereas the magnitudes of NAb titers were comparable between both subcohorts after third vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections occurred in equal numbers in homologously (38.9%) and heterologously (37.5%) vaccinated KTRs with mild-to-moderate courses of COVID-19. Conclusion: Our data support a more comprehensive assessment of not only humoral but also cellular SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity in KTRs to provide an in-depth understanding about the COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune response in a transplant setting.

Impact of COVID-19 infection and vaccination in pancreatobiliary IgG4-related disease patients: An international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Dedicated studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on outcomes of pancreatobiliary IgG4 related disease (IgG4-RD) patients are scarce. Whether COVID-19 infection or vaccination would trigger IgG4-RD exacerbation remains unknown. METHODS: Pancreatobiliary IgG4-RD patients ≥ 18 years old with active follow-up since January 2020 from nine referral centers in Asia, Europe, and North America were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Outcome measures include incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection, IgG4-RD disease activity and treatment status, interruption of indicated IgG4-RD treatment. Prospective data on COVID-19 vaccination status and new COVID-19 infection during the Omicron outbreak were also retrieved in the Hong Kong cohort. RESULTS: Of the 124 pancreatobiliary IgG4-RD patients, 25.0% had active IgG4-RD, 71.0% were on immunosuppressive therapies and 80.6% had ≥ 1 risk factor for severe COVID. In 2020 (pre-vaccination period), two patients (1.6%) had COVID-19 infection (one requiring ICU admission), and 7.2% of patients had interruptions in indicated immunosuppressive treatment for IgG4-RD. Despite a high vaccination rate (85.0%), COVID-19 infection rate has increased to 20.0% during Omicron outbreak in the Hong Kong cohort. A trend towards higher COVID-19 infection rate was noted in the non-fully vaccinated/unvaccinated group (17.6% vs 33.3%, P = 0.376). No IgG4-RD exacerbation following COVID-19 vaccination or infection was observed. CONCLUSION: While a low COVID-19 infection rate with no mortality was observed in pancreatobiliary IgG4-RD patients in the pre-vaccination period of COVID-19, infection rate has increased during the Omicron outbreak despite a high vaccination rate. No IgG4-RD exacerbation after COVID-19 infection or vaccination was observed.

COVID-19 in intensive care medicine.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic can lead to a severe course of disease in immunosuppressed patients requiring intensive care unit treatment even though a number of new vaccines and new antiviral drugs exist. One of the main reasons for this is the generally poorer immune response under immunosuppression. Therefore, it is all the more important to know the stages of the disease and to select the currently available therapeutic options accordingly.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

The safety of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised children and young adults with immune-mediated inflammatory disease.

AIM: To assess safety of COVID-19 vaccination in paediatric patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID). METHODS: Subjects of 5-21 years of age with IMID who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine completed electronic surveys after each vaccine to assess side effects within 1 week of vaccination, current medications and COVID-19 testing after vaccination. Charts were reviewed for COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction and IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein results and for disease flare during the study period. RESULTS: Among 190 enrolled subjects, 71% were female, with median age 17 (range 6-21) years. The most common diagnosis was juvenile idiopathic arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis (55%). 78% of subjects were taking immunosuppressive medication. At least one side effect was reported in 65% of subjects after any dose of the vaccine; with side effects in 38%, 53% and 55% of subjects after the first, second and third vaccine doses, respectively. The most common side effects were injection site pain (59%), fatigue (54%) and headache (39%). No anaphylaxis or myocarditis was reported. Three subjects (2%) experienced disease flare. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of paediatric patients with IMID, observed side effects were found to be mild and disease flare rates were found to be low following COVID-19 vaccination.

COVID-19 Mortality in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Real Concern.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) is a worldwide pandemic that has devastated the world in a way that has not been witnessed since the Spanish Flu in 1918. In this study, we aim to investigate the outcomes of patients with rheumatic diseases infected with COVID-19 in Oman. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective cohort study included patients with underlying rheumatological conditions and COVID-19 infection. Data were collected through the electronic record system and by interviewing the patients through a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: 113 patients with different rheumatic diseases were included with the following rheumatological diagnoses: rheumatoid arthritis (40.7%), systemic lupus erythematosus (23.1%), psoriatic arthritis (8%), Behcet's disease (7%), ankylosing spondylitis (6.2%), other vasculitides, including Kawasaki disease (4.4%), and other diagnoses (10.6%). The mean (SD) age of patients was 43 (14) years, and 82.3% were female. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by PCR test in 84.1% of the patients. The most common symptoms at the time of presentation were fever (86%), cough (81%), headache (65%), and myalgia (60%). Hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection was reported in 24.1% of the patients, and 52.2% of these patients had received some form of treatment. In this cohort, the intake of immunosuppressive and immunomodulating medications was reported in 91.1% of the patients. During the COVID-19 infection, 68% of the patients continued taking their medications. Comorbidities were present in 39.8% of the patients. Pregnancy was reported in 2% of the patients. The 30 days mortality rate was found to be 3.5%. Diabetes, obesity, and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) were the strongest risk factor for mortality (p-value 0.000, 0.000, and 0.001, respectively). Rituximab was given in 3.8% of the patients, and it was significantly associated with increased mortality among the patients (p-value <0.001). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases have an increased mortality rate in comparison to the general population, with diabetes, morbid obesity, chronic kidney diseases, interstitial lung disease, cardiovascular disease, obstructive lung disease, and liver diseases as comorbidities being the most severe risk factors associated with death. Greater care should be provided to this population, including the prompt need for vaccination.

Comparison of risk factors during first and second wave of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD)-results from KRACC subset

Background: The differential influence and outcome of various risk factors on occurrence of COVID-19 among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) during different COVID-19 peaks is underreported. Aim(s): To assess the impact and outcome of conventional risk factors, immunosuppressants and comorbidities on the risk of COVID-19 among AIRD patients during the first two COVID-19 peaks. Design(s): Prospective, non-interventional longitudinal cohort study. Method(s): This is a subset of the KRA COVID19 cohort undertaken during the initial wave of COVID-19 (W1) (Apr-Dec 2021);and the 2nd-wave (W2) (Jan-Aug 2021). Data collected included description of AIRD subsets, treatment characteristics, comorbidities and COVID-19 occurrence. Risk factors associated with mortality were analyzed. The incidence rate was compared with that of the general population in the same geographic region. Result(s): AIRD patients (n = 2969) had a higher incidence of COVID-19 in the W2 (7.1%) than in the W1 (1.7%) as compared to the general population (Government bulletin). Age (P < 0.01) and duration of AIRD (P < 0.001) influenced COVID-19 occurrence in W2 while major disease subsets and immunosuppressants including glucocorticoids did not. The W2 had lower HCQ usage (aRR-0.81) and comorbidities like hypertension (aRR-0.54) and pre-existing lung disease (aRR-0.38;0.19-0.75) compared to W1. Older age (aRR-1.11) and coexistent diabetes mellitus (aRR 6.74) were independent risk factors associated with mortality in W2. Conclusion(s): We report 1.7 times higher occurrence and no influence of major disease subsets or immunosuppressants including glucocorticoids on COVID 19. Age and diabetes were independent risk factors for mortality.

A Clinical Case of Nosocomial Pneumonia as a Complication of COVID-19: How to Balance Benefits and Risks of Immunosuppressive Therapy?

We report a Russian case of a 61-year-old male patient with confirmed COVID-19 infection who developed nosocomial pneumonia complicated by lung abscess associated with multi-drug-resistant isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii, which could have been provoked due to the immunosuppressive therapy. We discuss the existing literature highlighting the issue of the prudent balance between benefits and risks when prescribing immunomodulators to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 due to the risk of difficult-to-treat nosocomial infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Currently, there is evidence of a substantial positive effect of dexamethasone on the course of COVID-19 in patients requiring supplemental oxygen or anti-interleukin-6 drugs in individuals with prominent systemic inflammation. However, it seems that in real clinical practice, the proposed criteria for initiating treatment with immunomodulators are interpreted arbitrarily, and the doses of dexamethasone can significantly exceed those recommended.

Application of Magnetocardiography to Screen for Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy and Monitor Treatment Response.

Background Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is one of the most common causes of sudden cardiac death in young adults. Diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy remains challenging, and better monitoring tools are needed. We present magnetocardiography as a method to diagnose myocardial inflammation and monitor treatment response. Methods and Results A total of 233 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 45 (±18) years, and 105 (45%) were women. The primary analysis included 209 adult subjects, of whom 66 (32%) were diagnosed with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, 17 (8%) were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis, and 35 (17%) were diagnosed with other types of nonischemic cardiomyopathy; 91 (44%) did not have cardiomyopathy. The second analysis included 13 patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy who underwent immunosuppressive therapy after baseline magnetocardiography measurement. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography was tested in 3 independent cohorts (total n=23) and 1 patient, who developed vaccine-related myocarditis. First, we identified a magnetocardiography vector to differentiate between patients with cardiomyopathy versus patients without cardiomyopathy (vector of ≥0.051; sensitivity, 0.59; specificity, 0.95; positive predictive value, 93%; and negative predictive value, 64%). All patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, including a patient with mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis, had a magnetocardiography vector ≥0.051. Second, we evaluated the ability of the magnetocardiography vector to reflect treatment response. We observed a decrease of the pathologic magnetocardiography vector toward normal in all 13 patients who were clinically improving under immunosuppressive therapy. Magnetocardiography detected treatment response as early as day 7, whereas echocardiographic detection of treatment response occurred after 1 month. The magnetocardiography vector decreased from 0.10 at baseline to 0.07 within 7 days (P=0.010) and to 0.03 within 30 days (P<0.001). After 30 days, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 42.2% at baseline to 53.8% (P<0.001). Conclusions Magnetocardiography has the potential to be used for diagnostic screening and to monitor early treatment response. The method is valuable in inflammatory cardiomyopathy, where there is a major unmet need for early diagnosis and monitoring response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Risk factors associated with bacteremia in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

PURPOSE: This multicenter observational study was done to evaluate risk factors related to the development of BSI in patients admitted to ICU for COVID-19. METHODS: All patients with COVID-19 admitted in two COVID-19 dedicated ICUs in two different hospital between 02-2020 and 02-2021 were recruited. RESULT: 537 patients were included of whom 265 (49.3%) experienced at least one BSI. Patients who developed bacteremia had a higher SOFA score [10 (8-12) vs 9 (7-10), p < 0.001], had been intubated more frequently [95.8% vs 75%, p < 0.001] and for a median longer time [16 days (9-25) vs 8 days (5-14), p < 0.001]. Patients with BSI had a median longer ICU stay [18 days (12-31.5) vs 9 days (5-15), p < 0.001] and higher mortality [54% vs 42.3%, p < 0.001] than those who did not develop it. Development of BSI resulted in a higher SOFA score [aHR 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.12)] and a higher Charlson score [csAHR 1.15 (95% CI 1.05-1.25)]. CONCLUSION: A high SOFA score and a high Charlson score resulted associated with BSI's development. Conversely, immunosuppressive therapy like steroids and tocilizumab, has no role in increasing the risk of bacteremia.

Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis.

The field of inflammatory disease of the heart or "cardio-immunology" is rapidly evolving due to the wider use of non-invasive diagnostic tools able to detect and monitor myocardial inflammation. In acute myocarditis, recent data on the use of immunomodulating therapies have been reported both in the setting of systemic autoimmune disorders and in the setting of isolated forms, especially in patients with specific histology (e.g., eosinophilic myocarditis) or with an arrhythmicburden. A role for immunosuppressive therapies has been also shown in severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition that can be associated with cardiac injury and acute myocarditis. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are assessing the role of high dosage methylprednisolone in the context of acute myocarditis complicated by heart failure or fulminant presentation or the role of anakinra to treat patients with acute myocarditis excluding patients with hemodynamically unstable conditions. In addition, the explosion of immune-mediated therapies in oncology has introduced new pathophysiological entities, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and new basic research models to understand the interaction between the cardiac and immune systems. Here we provide a broad overview of evolving areas in cardio-immunology. We summarize the use of new imaging tools in combination with endomyocardial biopsy and laboratory parameters such as high sensitivity troponin to monitor the response to immunomodulating therapies based on recent evidence and clinical experience. Concerning pericarditis, the normal composition of pericardial fluid has been recently elucidated, allowing to assess the actual presence of inflammation; indeed, normal pericardial fluid is rich in nucleated cells, protein, albumin, LDH, at levels consistent with inflammatory exudates in other biological fluids. Importantly, recent findings showed how innate immunity plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein, with inflammasome and IL-1 overproduction as drivers for systemic inflammatory response. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents such as anakinra and rilonacept have been demonstrated highly effective in patients with recurrent pericarditis associated with an inflammatory phenotype.

Clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 infection in liver transplant recipients: single-center cross-sectional study

Background. The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on all areas of health care system, including organ donation and transplantation. Despite this, there were no large Russian studies of COVID-19 course and outcomes in liver transplant recipients. The study purpose was to determine prevalence, clinical course, severity, outcomes of COVID-19, as well as to assess the safety and efficiency of vaccination for disease prevention in liver transplant recipients. Material and methods. 260 recipients (71% of all patients at risk of COVID-19 disease) who underwent liver transplantation at State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center from May 2010 to September 2021 were included in a single-center cross-sectional study. Data collection was performed during a telephone or face-to-face interview from September 6, 2021 to September 20, 2021. If patients were hospitalized with COVID-19, we also analyzed the results of laboratory and instrumental tests, other medical documentation. Results. By mid-September 2021, the incidence of COVID-19 after liver transplantation was 31% (75 cases in 260 recipients). Asymptomatic course was observed in 11 (15%) patients. Hospitalization was required in 18 (28%) cases. In one case, COVID-19 infection was the cause of death. Mortality and death rate in the study cohort were 1% (1/75) and 0.4% (1/260), respectively. Risk factors that statistically significantly increased the likelihood of infection with SARS-CoV-2 were contact with the patient (OR: 12.9;95% CI: 6.6 - 25.0) and non-compliance with nonspecific prophylaxis measures (OR: 2.0;95 % CI: 1.1 - 3.7). The recipient's age of 60 years or more significantly increased the risk of severe infection (OR 5.0;95% CI: 1.3 - 18.7). None of the immunosuppressive therapy regimens significantly increased the risk of severe disease. Tacrolimus monotherapy or in combination with other drugs reduced the risk of severe COVID-19 (OR: 0.2;95% CI: 0.1 - 0.95). Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, which was performed in 42 (17%) recipients, did not cause serious adverse events and significantly reduced the risk of COVID-19 disease (OR: 7.2;95% CI: 1.7 - 31.3). The detection rate of specific IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was 94% in recipients who had undergone the disease and 45% among those vaccinated (p<0.001). The achieved level of herd immunity against COVID-19 in the analyzed cohort was 48%. Conclusion. Adult liver transplant recipients are not at an excessive risk of COVID-19 disease. Compliance with preventive measures and vaccination can significantly reduce the risks of infection and severe infection. There is no objective evidence that immunosuppressive therapy increases the risk of severe COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients. In the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, tacrolimus monotherapy may be considered as a safe regimen of maintenance immunosuppression. © Voskanyan S.E., Sushkov A.I., Rudakov V.S., Svetlakova D.S., Popov M.V., Pashkov A.N., Muktarzhan M., Lukianchikova A.S., 2022

The latest progress on novel coronavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients

Due to long-term use of immunosuppressant, poor immune function and a higher risk of critical diseases after novel coronavirus pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients, it is of significance to deliver prophylactic vaccination for this high-risk population. Studies have shown that the immune reaction of kidney transplant recipients to novel coronavirus vaccine is significantly lower than that of healthy counterparts. Standard vaccination program in the United States, such as 2 doses of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, fails to provide sufficient protection for kidney transplant recipients. Many studies have proven that increasing the frequency of vaccination for kidney transplant recipients may enhance the vaccine efficacy. Nevertheless, the role of adjusting immunosuppressive therapy in increasing vaccine efficacy remains to be elucidated. In this article, the importance, effectiveness and particularity of novel coronavirus vaccine for kidney transplant recipients and the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on the efficacy of novel coronavirus vaccine were reviewed, aiming to provide reference on the vaccination for kidney transplant recipients. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR]

Booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines strengthens the specific immune response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective multicenter longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the kinetics of humoral and T-cell responses in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-patients followed up to 4-6 weeks (T3) after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster dose. METHODS: Health care workers (HCWs, n = 38) and patients with RA (n = 52) completing the messenger RNA vaccination schedule were enrolled at T3. In each cohort, 25 subjects were sampled after 5 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) from the first vaccine dose. The humoral response was assessed by measuring anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies, the T-cell response by interferon-γ-release assay (IGRA), T cell cytokine production, and B cell phenotype at T3 by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Patients with RA showed a significant reduction of antibody titers from T1 to T2 and a significant increase at T3. T-cell response by IGRA persisted over time in patients with RA, whereas it increased in HCWs. Most patients with RA scored positive for anti-RBD, neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses, although the magnitude was lower than HCWs. The spike-specific-cytokine response was mainly clusters of differentiation (CD)4+ T cells restricted in both cohorts and significantly lower with reduced interleukin-2 response and CD4-antigen-responding naïve T cells in patients with RA. Unswitched memory B cells were reduced in patients with RA compared with HCWs independently of vaccination. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine booster strengthens the humoral immunity in patients with RA even with a reduced cytokine response.